02 Apr 2026 16:53:57
Surely the £400k for Angel is not correct. Makes no sense at all if it is true. Spending so much on agent fees as well to achieve what, re-enforces that Shi 1 was an utter disaster. Is No. 2 is any better bet he can’t believe the situation he finds.

1.) 02 Apr 2026
02 Apr 2026 18:07:57
There's a reason why players like Angel Gomes spend most of their career on loan away from the Prem, and apart from one half of football so far, he has demonstrated that reason from what I've seen.
If we are paying that much, then someone, frankly, needs the boot, because that would be ridiculous.

2.) 02 Apr 2026
02 Apr 2026 18:24:01
Being reported on Sport Witness, Banksy. If it's true, I don't know, but it would not surprise me with what has been going on.

3.) 02 Apr 2026
02 Apr 2026 19:46:43
That is the thing with our club lately. Anything is possible with the way it has been run. All a blur now, but I think Shi 2 would have been in place for the Angel deal.

I hope I am wrong and it was the ? Shi 1.
Even though it has been an awful season, I still miss the matches. Maybe it is because we have improved recently.