13 Jun 2026 10:38:16
I read that Tim Spiers wrote in The Athletic a couple of days ago that Wolves are not a serious football club. This story was reprinted in the New York Times. Tim goes on to say that if Rob's results last season were 'slightly better' and his relations with fans were also 'slightly better' he probably wouldn't be in this position! (Only slightly better Tim? ) Tim goes on to say it would have been more palatable if Kieron McKenna of Ipswich had been lined up as Rob's successor! Dream on Tim! Furthermore Tim says that we had the worst season in our 149 year history.

Does he not know our real history? I'm sure that Kieron McKenna is gutted that he didn't get a phone call from Nathan! The Athletic article is surprisingly nothing but a hit job.

1.) 13 Jun 2026
13 Jun 2026 12:56:23
I get the 'if only this or that' argument, but the facts are that Wolves under Rob Edwards were bloody awful, and he'd lost the fans. But, fair play, Tim Spiers. If Wolves had played attacking football and won 20 more points, and not been relegated, we wouldn't be in the position we're in now.