Wolves Rumours Member Posts

 

Jas M's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



Jas M's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Jas M's Posts

 

 

To Jas M's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Jas M's last 5 banter posts

 

To Jas M's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Jas M's last 5 banter replies

 

Jas M's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Jas M's rumours posts

 

26 Mar 2024 22:19:50
A lot of paper talk stating that Man Utd want to speak to GON regarding a role at Old Trafford.

Eds, is there anything in this or is it just clickbait?

Jas M

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of any interest and he is not one of the coaches they have been looking at.}


1.) 27 Mar 2024 11:04:57
Why would he leave a job as a manager to go and play 2nd fiddle to another manager in a coach role? Doesn’t make sense.


2.) 27 Mar 2024 11:06:40
Bizarrely Jas it reads like they are suggesting that they would take Southgate and then GON would join him as a route of succession to the top job (replacing Southgate long term). Seems nonsensical to me as that (literally) wouldn't really suit any of the parties involved! Why would GON want to leave a Managers role to be a back up plan which in all reality would never happen anyway?! Very weird, it basically feels like they have no actual jobs to realistically tie him with so now they are just creating roles to tie him with?! Standard paper talk ?


3.) 27 Mar 2024 13:31:03
The rumour came from ESPN take it with a very large pinch of salt they've never been right about anything Wolves related.


4.) 27 Mar 2024 14:12:32
If the rumour about GON wanted for a coaching role at Man U is true, it's completely disrespectful and even laughable. He's nobody's number two! GON is going nowhere for now. And, if we play our cards right and sell well/invest well in the summer, Gary can take us into the top six next season. We've seen what he can do without a preseason at Bournemouth and Wolves; imagine what he can do when properly prepared and backed.


5.) 27 Mar 2024 14:21:34
Probably speculation based on GON looking for an improved Wolves deal.


 

 

21 Mar 2024 17:03:12
Apparently Liverpool are looking to sign players who may or may not fit into the new managers plans whilst Jim Ratcliffe is buying players for Man Utd even though he isn't sure who he wants as his manager.

Rumours have started that Ratcliffe wants to sign Joao Gomes for £40m.

I think he's undervalued him by £100m

Jas M

1.) 22 Mar 2024 06:37:35
I get the rumour part, £40m seems to be undervalued.

Wolves don't need to sell to comply with PSR rules (formerly FFP). So if they do decode to sell, it won't be for "fire sale" rates.


2.) 23 Mar 2024 11:31:55
The Sun reporting Klopp has recommended RAN as a liverpool signing, that said does anyone connected to Liverpool deal with the Sun.

{Ed001's Note - no. But they are happy to steal any story they see anywhere else, so it doesn't necessarily mean that someone spoke to them direct. They could have made it up or read someone else saying it.}


3.) 23 Mar 2024 12:57:52
So incoming managers have to make due with players they never chose? Why is that an issue with Gary, then? Is he special?


4.) 23 Mar 2024 13:51:22
Don't ever mention the Sun in Liverpool.


 

 

19 Mar 2024 18:43:53
Wolves keeping an eye on Eddie Nketiah who has been told he can leave Arsenal.

Wolves looking to offload Fabio Silva for £15m

Both rumours by Talking Wolves.

Jas M

1.) 19 Mar 2024 21:01:20
I think they would be making a mistake with Nketiah, unless he can play centre half! .May as well stick with Silva.


2.) 19 Mar 2024 22:04:42
My thoughts to.


3.) 20 Mar 2024 10:41:37
Be just like aesenal to offer him in a player/cash deal for neto


4.) 20 Mar 2024 10:52:44
Unless the circumstances are unusual a club like Arsenal wouldn't let a top player go.


5.) 20 Mar 2024 12:10:13
That's the problem. Nketiah isn't a top player.


6.) 20 Mar 2024 13:07:11
Exactly Jas!


 

 

14 Jan 2024 20:19:29
Some so called expert was on radio earlier stating that he was reliably informed that:

Everton will win their appeal against 10 point deduction but be given a 4 point deduction following the latest PSR report as they breached by £100m.

Forest to get a 6 point deduction for breaching by £62m

Wolves to be deducted 15 points for £2m breach.

Arsenal are £200m over limit and Villa £250 but both have been shown leniency because they will potentially end up in Champions League positions.

He stated that all 3 will launch an appeal and that he has heard that the PL want Wolves out for some reason.

Jas M

1.) 14 Jan 2024 22:34:07
That's just mischief making. They can't get away with giving forest 6 point deduction for 62 million breach and WW 15 points for 2 million breach. They'd be sued to death. We have to wait and see what tomorrow brings. Cut the speculation.


2.) 14 Jan 2024 23:06:51
Jas M you nearly gave me a heart attack!

Information on BBC stating Everton and Nottingham Forest expect to be told that they have exceeded the ‘’ffp loss levels ’, another report stated possibly Fulham and Aston Villa as well. Here’s hoping Wolves did enough with the sales at the start of the season.


3.) 15 Jan 2024 01:03:11
This has to be some sort of a conspiracy rumour. There is no way that could be true? It just would make no sense for docking so many points compared to others? And why does the PL want us gone?


4.) 15 Jan 2024 06:26:46
Latest from the Athletic is Everton and Forest will be told they have been found guilty today.
Both knew it was coming and have already prepared their Appeal cases.
All the conjecture should be cleared up in a couple of hours.


5.) 15 Jan 2024 06:45:24
Fingers crossed ?


6.) 15 Jan 2024 07:18:54
Only online resource reporting Wolves and breach of FFP is the iNews, while a lot more are carrying the Everton / Forest story.

As for the PL wanting Wolves out, that's 100% toilet water (aimed at whatever "expert" made that comment)


7.) 15 Jan 2024 10:52:10
Obviously until our accounts for the 22/23 season are annouced it is only speculation but the rumour in the Telegraph was that we would/have lose/t £65m in 22/23.
Given prior year figures of £46m loss in 21/22 and £21m profit in 20/21, (Note both these figures are also impacted by Covid - fixtures moved from 1 year to another amongst other thngs - and thus may attract some "allowance"), we should be comfortably inside the £105m rolling three year losses allowed?
Note this £105m is made up of £5m pa of straight forward losses and £30m pa of owner back losses - given Fosun wrote off more than that I assume that counts as "backing".
There are also adjustments allowed for certain things like ladies football, academy work etc etc
Please be aware however that the sale of Nunes, Neves etc are in the year 23/24 and thus are not included in these figures.
Those sales were made because in 23/24 our FFP position will be made up of the £46m loss in 21/2 the £65m loss in 22/23 and whatever outcome occurs in 23/24.
Simple maths says £46 + £65 is already more than £105! Hence we have to make a small profit, >£6m, this year 23/24 and the sales were designed to ensure that.
Again it is unclear if we have done enough as obviously a large chunk of our income is results dependentand thus unknown until the end f the season in May 24.
Hopefully management are on the ball and that will determine our activity this Jan i.e. do we have to sell Kilman or Neto now!
Next year 24/25 the £46m drops out of the 3 year cycle leaving us a £65m loss and this years >£6m profit ie we have a fair bit of wriggle room so may not have to sell anyone in the summer and could even make apurchase or two!
All above based on grey assumptions as I am not privy to Wolves finacical affairs beyond the published accounts.


8.) 15 Jan 2024 11:08:31
Great research there, futureisoldgold.


9.) 15 Jan 2024 11:32:01
Here here echo Deep Throat reply.


10.) 15 Jan 2024 12:20:44
future. Thank you, even I can understand that! Makes a change!


11.) 15 Jan 2024 13:25:53
Keen did a article stating Wolves owners expect Wolves to pass the ffp.


12.) 16 Jan 2024 02:25:13
I don't know how trustworthy the source is but on twitter the Wolfpack has announced 10hours ago that wolves are clear of ffp following transfer sales etc

{Ed001's Note - it would have been announced if they were in trouble.}


 

 

03 Jan 2024 15:23:31
Noha Lemina, 18 year old brother of Mario set to join on loan with option to buy. If he's half as good as his brother, we'll be getting one hell of a player.

Jas M

1.) 03 Jan 2024 20:59:45
Jas M we should be trying to sign a striker not some eighteen kid for the future as normal.


2.) 03 Jan 2024 20:15:48
Yes mate was just about to post it until I saw your post, Wolves are in talks with PSG over signing 18-year-old Noha Lemina, brother of Mario Lemina.

Talks ongoing over a loan with an option to buy. No agreement yet but talks on.

He’s currently on loan at Sampdoria but he would be recalled to then join Wolves, if all goes well.


3.) 03 Jan 2024 21:27:42
Dek123, maybe we will but there's no harm preparing for the future at the same time.


4.) 03 Jan 2024 21:51:51
Also reported were looking at Hugo Ekitike from PSG currently on loan at Sampdoria.


5.) 04 Jan 2024 22:15:42
Is Ekitike at Sampdoria? If he is then there's no point signing him as he's played 1 game for PSG. If he's played any minutes at all for Sampdoria, he won't be allowed to play for us this season.


6.) 06 Jan 2024 12:32:04
Jas I think I misread the original report Ekitike is I think at PSG and Leminas brother is loaned out to Sampdoria.


 

 

 

Jas M's banter posts with other poster's replies to Jas M's banter posts

 

29 Mar 2024 09:17:32
Big game tomorrow.

No Dawson, Hwang, Neto or Bellegarde for us and Cunha may be lacking match fitness

The organisational qualities of Dawson will be a huge miss but hopefully the errors from the Coventry tie have been addressed.

No McGinn for them so midfield battle between Mario/Gomes v Luiz is crucial.

Jas M

 

 

18 Mar 2024 23:05:55
Eds,

What are the changes to FFP from this summer.

I heard a so expert say that in layman's terms, it will now be a salary cap so that a club can only spend 70% of all income on wages. Apparently all other expenditure used in the previous method has been removed.

Jas M

{Ed001's Note - I am writing it as an article for you mate. It would be pointless me saying what has changed without explaining what the current PSR is. It has ended up as far too long a reply to just shoehorn in here, so I will post it as an article. That will also give the rest of the sites a chance to read it as well.}


1.) 19 Mar 2024 06:03:53
Cheers Ed.

{Ed001's Note - in case it fails to autolink: PSR Regs.

It is bloody complicated and we won't know for sure what the new PSR will be until the league AGM in June. They might even decide not to change yet! But hopefully they will go with the UEFA set up, as they have currently agreed to that. It is much simpler.}


2.) 19 Mar 2024 08:16:31
Nice one Ed.

{Ed001's Note - thank you Jas, I hope that explains it for you ok?}


3.) 19 Mar 2024 09:24:58
It does indeed Ed.

The guy on the radio yesterday was suggesting that this would more or less be a wage cap based on a clubs incoming revenue. He then used the example of Man Utd earning an average of £2 250 000 per home game from gate receipts compared to Bournemouths £330 000 gate receipts and how smaller clubs can't offer the same wages and thereby having the better players and widening the gap between the clubs at the top and bottom of the football pyramid.

I realise that there is a lot more to so it will be interesting once implemented.

{Ed001's Note - to a degree he is correct and that is certainly a problem. It requires a 'smaller' club, in terms of revenue at least, to build their revenue up to be competitive over the long term. To be honest that has always been a problem though, the only thing that has changed is the potential for a megawealthy person/consortium to buy a club and just pump money in to that club in a similar fashion to Man City. Considering how much in the way of lies comes out of that club about their revenue (and how they have a full house according to their accounts at every home game), maybe it was a door they should have closed sooner.

I would like to see a simple thing done - if an owner wants to pump money in, then they have to put the same amount in escrow that the Premier League controls in case it goes wrong. So that the Premier League could then use it to pay off debts, tax bills etc if the owner then is unable or unwilling to do so. There does need to be a way for smaller clubs to be able to have an input of money to become competitive. Just not via under the counter payments like City!}


4.) 19 Mar 2024 10:45:13
Sometimes it's easier to just accept something as it is, if rich individuals wish to bankroll football clubs then so be it. Good business lawyers and accountants will find ways to create stadium naming rights like Manchester City or Villa type lease deals anyway. So yes Ed001 you have a valid point in my opinion.

Of more concern to me is:

A the probity of the cash coming in to these clubs.

B the potential to milk a club, eg: what happened to Manchester United with the club meeting the cost of the takeover.

{Ed001's Note - there certainly is issues with the vetting process, which has allowed a man with absolutely no funding of his own (Moshiri) to buy a club when he was clearly a front for a man who, at the time, had a large chunk of another club (Usmanov). It has left Everton in serious difficulties as they are still treating Everton like they have a multi-billionaire owner, even though the real owner now has had all his funds frozen after the invasion of Ukraine. At the moment the company that is trying to buy the Toffees is paying wages etc, but the Premier League seem unlikely to pass that company (777) as fit and proper. So where on earth does that leave Everton? All the Prem had to do was investigate Moshiri probably and they would have seen he had zero in terms of real money and block him buying the club in the first place. That should be something they are looking at.

I am in full agreement that what happened to Man Utd is a disgrace, even though it was them. I do believe that rules now block anyone from buying a club in the same way, thankfully.}


5.) 20 Mar 2024 06:35:33
Ok. If I'm reading this right then it will come down to money coming into the club from sponsors, marketing, maybe even additional investors to compete. Essentially, external incoming money other than just gate money?

Has anyone heard the song 'we're all living in America'. It's true eventually our beloved game will go just like American football where advertising etc is paid handsomely to clubs, and everything is based on marketing. We'll have sodding bands playing in extended interval all to raise a few extra quid.


6.) 21 Mar 2024 07:40:32
Super leagues, sin bins/blue cards, 'extended play', changes in KO times, VAR reviews, extra subs and so on are all in the marketing movement already blackfords


7.) 21 Mar 2024 18:04:04
Yes Abbeywolf, unfortunately you're right. Companies paying for advertising slots on TV to increase revenue etc. The rich and big just get richer and bigger.


 

 

17 Mar 2024 18:42:40
Despite our result yesterday, this weekend has provided us fans with 3 outstanding Qtr Finals to show the World why The FA Cup is so unique.

Jas M

1.) 17 Mar 2024 20:17:46
Just proves var is corrupt.
W.ham goal ruled out
Coventry's allowed.
Smh


2.) 18 Mar 2024 00:52:19
VAR is not corrupt. It’s just the standard of people on VAR and refs in general who are terrible and don’t know how to interpret the laws.


3.) 18 Mar 2024 05:56:19
See man city avoided man u in the semis! Thus ensuring maximum chance of maximum tv fees, or am I being too cynical? And that's just it vbwolf, do we trust the people who 'don't know how to interpret it'.?


4.) 18 Mar 2024 13:50:52
I've seen a few wild theories on X saying the balls for the draw have bumps on them for city and united so those who draw them know.
But it is just conspiracy theories.


5.) 18 Mar 2024 15:39:19
Apparently the ball numbers for the cup draw weren't displayed on TV showing which teams they represented. In theory therefore the draw could have been doctored. Not saying it was but just fuelling the conspiracy theories!


6.) 18 Mar 2024 16:14:16
I think it's most probably a recurring coincidence, but it always seems to favour the same way. Or I'm still a tad bitter, I bet we wouldn't have got Leicester if we'd both got through though!


7.) 18 Mar 2024 20:34:44
I was told a long while ago that certain balls could be put in a fridge before the draw so as to differentiate them from the others. No idea of the truth in any of that.


 

 

14 Mar 2024 10:06:07
Another day, another match and yet another ticketing disaster by Wolves.

Selected my tickets for me (adult) and my 18 year old son (U21).

Could not make the purchase system said I had selected the wrong ticket type (I hadn't).

Logged out, cleared the cache, logged in, tried again, same error.

Logged in using my son's details and still the same issue.

20 minutes later after constant issue, managed to get tickets in the corner (original tickets were behind the goals).

Phoned up the club and they said they are aware of the IT issues. and were looking into it.

BUT, I have purchased tickets for all the home games this season except v Brighton and Sheff Utd and every single time I have had to contact the club as they have usually overcharged me or confirmed my tickets in a different part of the ground.

Is anyone else having similar issues?

Jas M

 

 

10 Mar 2024 09:56:00
I think we'll get another 17 points from our remaining 10 games:

Wins against Burnley, West Ham, Palace, Luton and Bournemouth.

Draw against Villa and Forest

Lose against Man City, Arsenal and Liverpool.

That will be 58 points.

Very good season considering our disrupted pre season.

Jas M

1.) 10 Mar 2024 10:16:11
Not sure about west Ham but I'm in the 15 to 20 ballpark, there's always the possibility of surprising Man City were a bit of a bogey side to them.


2.) 10 Mar 2024 10:30:25
Yea I'm in the 14/15 area as well ardunby, there's always likely to be an upset both for and against us. No matter what it'll exceed our expectations. Throw in a cup final, and what a year we'd have! One game at a time though.


3.) 10 Mar 2024 11:31:13
I've just watched the highlights from yesterday and I've changed my mind about MOM-Jose Sa.


4.) 10 Mar 2024 11:55:40
We've got 41 points/28 games, which is approx 1.5 points mean. 10 games left so if we assume the same average then you're all there or thereabouts. Say 55-56 points which would be phenomenal given what we all probably thought at the start of the season.


5.) 10 Mar 2024 12:13:52
Based on only taking 4 points from our first 6 games we've taken 37 from the last 22 and if I've calculated correctly from the last 11 of those 22 points.

So since Christmas Eve 2 points per game.


6.) 10 Mar 2024 14:26:03
Would be fantastic if we were to accumulate that many points (17-ish), but are some peeps taking into account of our injury list?


7.) 11 Mar 2024 06:57:48
I think we'll beat the Villa.


8.) 11 Mar 2024 07:06:08
Just been told mcginn will miss the wolves game.


9.) 11 Mar 2024 08:33:39
One of the 'experts' after the Villa game said "McGinn isn't this type of player" (after the sending off). WHAT! the bloke is an animal!


10.) 11 Mar 2024 11:00:50
McGinn has got away with a few bad challenges against us in recent seasons if my memory serves me correctly.


11.) 11 Mar 2024 18:26:31
The way he wrestled Craig Dawson to the ground at Molineux then playing dumb was astounding.


 

 

 

Jas M's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Mar 2024 12:10:13
That's the problem. Nketiah isn't a top player.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Mar 2024 22:04:42
My thoughts to.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Mar 2024 22:08:09
You're right. GON has said they both look like significant injuries. Hopefully Noah and Fraser can step up.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Mar 2024 17:25:41
I think Neto was raken off as a precaution.

But hopefully Cunha is back next week and Hwang and Bellegarde ready after the International break.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Mar 2024 13:20:34
Both Hwang and Cunha's main position are Centre Forward but they are not being played in their favoured position for whatever reason. Likewise, Noah Lemina is an Attacking Midfielder who can also play on either wing.

Looks like GON is after players who can play multiple positions.

Jas M

 

 

 

Jas M's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

28 Mar 2024 18:32:23
This is the reason I hate the media. They are free to write whatever they want no matter how liablous and there seems to be nothing anyone can do about it.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Mar 2024 17:34:59
Personally I think David Beckham was the most over rated England player of all time.

I also think Lionel Messi is not the greatest player of all time as most people think. Maradona was better.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Mar 2024 11:45:50
Southgate always was and will always be a Yes man to the FA. I remember the good old days when Bobby Robson, Terry Venables, Glenn Hoddle and Kevin Keegan selected players based on form, not the club you played for.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Mar 2024 21:41:33
He must have some dirt on Southgate. Why else would he continually be picked.

On another note, we'll done to Joao Gomes on his debut. Looked good in the middle of the park. The 1st of hopefully many more caps.

Jas M

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Mar 2024 12:19:59
I don't think the excitement is over. If a possible push for European qualification doesn't spur the players and fans on, then I don't know what will.

Jas M

 

 





Change Consent